Answer:
Yes he may prevail
Explanation:
He wants to exercise his civic duty and he has every right to file a suit because he has been taxes indirectly to the city.
Firstly, The farmer does not pay any tax directly to the city because a portion of his farm property is turned over by the county to the city to support the city police department, which indirectly, he is paying tax because this support to the city is categorized indirectly as his tax.
Secondly, His farm property has been vandalized several times over the months and the police didn't do anything about it to improve his situation which calls for attention to why nothing has been done about it despite his support to the city police department.
With the two above paragraphs, he has a point and his also lives in one of the rural communities and the city ordinance provides that only residents of the city may vote, but the city ordinance is always the city ordinance, the law might and might not favor him, he could get payment for the damages on his properties, but it would be quite difficult for him to prevail over the suit because he doesn't live in the city
I'm assuming its talking about South America AKA Central America
I believe the answer is: increasing generalizability
Generalizability refers to the extend that a conclusion of a research could be applicable to different people. As generalizability goes higher, The reliability of the measurement would be increased. and it could easily be replicable even if the test subjects are drastically altered.
Answer:
The answer is stated below.
Explanation:
In theory, African Americans were granted equal protection under the law, slavery of abolished and they were equipped with voting Rights. But in reality, the majority of Blacks were landless and dependent on the white landholding gentry. Southern legislature restricted their voting rights. And the incidence of violence speak for themselves about how blacks were persecuted in the south.
