Explanation:
Anti-Federalism was a late-18th century movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The previous constitution, called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, gave state governments more authority. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, Anti-Federalists worried, among other things, that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. Though the Constitution was ratified and supplanted the Articles of Confederation, Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.
King Ezana became King of Axum, and embraced Christianity around 327 A.D. He made it the official religion and with the head of the church, Frumentius, they spread the word of Christianity. King Ezana even created currency with crosses on the coins.
The detail from the text that best conveys the message to reader that people in positions of power will <u>naturally abuse that power</u> is:
- <u>D. "Whatever power he has received, he has a corrupt nature that will improve it in one thing or other..."</u>
- According to Cotton, he is of the opinion that the people who get into positions of power will naturally abuse them as it is the way human nature is and cannot be changed, no matter how one tries to.
- From his speech, he made the statement that man has a corrupt nature that he would always want more power.
- He stated that once he has had a little taste of it, this can lead him into doing some bad things to remain in power, which leads to an abuse of such power.
- As a result of these, the correct answer is option D
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/24533070
The first part cited the following arguments in favour of changing the form of government: All people are created equal and that they have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; To ensure these rights, people create Governments with the consent of those who govern them; The right of people to abolish decisions of state. Structures and displacement, the abolition of the structures themselves.
The second part of the declaration said: The King of England is a usurper, criticizing the organization of power from the standpoint of the doctrine of separation of powers: The King has placed judges in exceptional dependence on his will, the King seeks to make military power Independent from the civil and put the first above the second, the main conclusion was that the King is not able to govern the free people.
I don't remember but I think it was no
