Answer:
a short and concise sentence that states what you believe to be true
events, quotes, or passages that support your claim
Explanation:
Answer:
Less CO2 and H2O would be produced
Explanation:
Since you can only change the amount of reactants, you should be looking for compounds on the reactant side that contain oxygen. If you decrease something on the reactant side, compounds produced on the product side will be affected. Since both CO2 and H2O contain oxygen, and the O2 is the only reactant with oxygen in it, then the amount of CO2 and H2O will be reduced.
The first one.
Explanation:
In this first one, the author is pulling apart what the evidence means (analysing it).
In the 2nd, it is NOT analyzing a piece of evidence specifically, it's summarizes the point and says it's supported by the evidence. So, not analyzing.
In the 3rd, the author is applying it to the situation and explaining why it's important, which is different from analysis.
In the 4th, the author is offering an example as evidence, not analyzing a piece of evidence.
Answer:
"is not always directly stated".
Explanation:
Please let me know if you need an explanation!
