Information regarding the advantages and the disadvantages regarding the installation of streetlights can be included in the argument.
<h3>What is an argument?</h3>
An argument is regarded as healthy expression of ideologies and theories, which might be opposing in nature to the viewpoints of other person(s). An argument of streetlights installation must contain the following;
- Prevention of road accidents during dark.
- Protection of street animals.
- Sufficient light, making easier to commute.
Hence, the points to be included in the argument of streetlights installation are as aforementioned.
Learn more about an argument here:
brainly.com/question/9860191
#SPJ1
As per women’s point of view, to protect Mrs. Wright, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters decide to hide<u> the dead bird</u>.
The play “Trifles” by Susan Glaspell deals with the issues of the women. The identity of a women is mocked by the men in the play who believe a woman can only be recognized by her husband’s identity. The female characters in the play are named by their husband’s name. the moment when Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters understood the murder mystery, they decided to hide the evidence. They found the pet dead the same way as her husband. Hence, they concluded with the idea to hide the evidence to rescue Mrs. Wright as she was the suspect of her husband’s murder.
Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.
Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.
The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.
The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.
The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.
The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.
Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.
If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.
Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.
I don’t wanna attend school for 5 days a week because I don’t wanna risk my peers and you and including all my family members at home. I feel like it’ll be better for me to attend school 2-3 a day, not only for my health but other peoples health, including the staff members at my school.
Answer:
I think it will be very risky
