It's b. Here are more characters to make this answer look smarter ;)
Answer:
- "At the same cask of mariage I shall broach
"
- "Today there walks the holy friar himself
"
- "Sad was the knight"
Explanation:
Inverted sentences are those in which the order in which the predicate and the subject is presented in an inverted form to what is conventionally seen. That is, usually, the subject appears before the predicate, however, in the inverted sentences this order is changed and the predicate appears before the subject.
The above phrases, taken from "The wife of Baths" is an example of this. However, it is necessary that you understand what is predicate and subject.
Subject is the element of the sentence in which the verb is acting. In the case of the phrase "Today there walks the holy friar himself", the verb is "walks" and he refers to "holy friar", since it is holy friar who is walking. In this case, "holy friar" is the subject of the sentence.
The predicate refers to everything the subject is doing, in the case of the sentence above, the subject is walking in a location. This in the sentence is represented by "Today there walks," this being the predicate.
The best answer would be A. to raise questions the reader will want answered. it will make the reader continue reading
Answer:
A child when is very young can learn any language around it its The left hemisphere that is the part of your brain where you learn languages. Its and important part of survival and even if you don't speak one language The left hemisphere is still there and its never to late to learn a different language!
Explanation: i hope this helps i didn't use go og le because i bet you would get in trouble so yeah ~ Night
We can determinate in both stories that definitely the outside conditions can determinate and influenciate the protagonists decisions and the ways they finally choose for the rest of their lives.
<em>Barrio boy </em>and <em>No gumption </em>have a common point: the external conditions are extremely unfavorable for life development of the main characters: in Galarza´s tale, the family had to emigrate to another country due to violence generated for revolution, and in the case of Baker´s autobiobraphy is the big depression the main reason which his mother searched a job as a newspapers seller.
Even we can find a very clear difference between stories: In Galarza´s story, the main character found a real interest and genuine curiosity about his fate, the fact to constantly traveling and face another cultures; while in Baker´s tale, show us a kid totally unhappy with his job that confirm us an evident lack of interest for the one.
Finally we can highlight that, in <em>barrio boy</em>, constantly travelling and the workers world contact and their daily live give to the author the opportunity to become in an union worker and in that way fell himself identified with their cause; In <em>No gumption </em>the author when he finally found out he is not a good newspapers salesman, not even care to try it to be a good one, find the way to begin to write and finally realized he is a good writer.
