Answer:
go to google and btw mark me brainliest
Explanation:
Main causes:
Importance of growth in colonies
Shortage of labor
Failure to find alternative sources of labor
The legal position
Racial attitudes
Religious factors
Military factors
Brief explanation:
Increasing numbers of slaves were transported across the Atlantic because of the new form of farming that developed in the European colonies of the New World.
European farmers attempted to use native populations as a source of labour, which proved difficult. However, tha did not stop the development of the New Word.
With new land available, labourers were always tempted to leave their job and start their own farm. Wages needed to be high enough to tempt them to stay, reducing the planters’ profit margins.
The status of slaves as property was long established. The use of the property law meant that the enslaved were not considered humans, but commodities.
Several ideas from the time supported the enslavement of Africans:
Africans were seen as more suited to work on the plantations
African captives would be executed if the slave trade was abolished
African slaves were seen as benefitting from being looked after by the superior Europeans
Some Bible passages were used to justify slavery. In Genesis Noah placed the 'curse of Ham' on the descendents of his son, starting with his grandson Canaan.
Who could use this weapon? the answer is Everyone can use nonviolence as long that they do not take weapons.
he believed it could achieve peace without going to war, or blood shed.
Answer:
What was an immediate effect of the completion of the Erie Canal in 1825? Prices increased for food products along the Atlantic Coast. Farmers could more easily ship grain to eastern markets. A territorial conflict began with Canada over the Great Lakes.
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. </u>And this reality could be <u>social, political or religious.</u>
Explanation:
I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.
- France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. <u>To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. </u>The question is: why this conception worked in France? <u>Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.</u>
- On the contrary, in England, <u>the king was subjected to the Parlament. </u>However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings <u>followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). </u>This idea attests that <u>a king has duties with its people,</u> and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.
