Answer:
Overall, this was a successful conference. Both sides agreed to the unconditional surrender demand.
It was successful at making China a leader on the Allied side, but there were tensions between the UK-US and China.
The three agreed with the invasion on the French coastline and defeating Germany. Overall, it was a success.
The Soviets agreed to enter the war with Japan, but Churchill and FDR had to compromise on other issues to get this to happen.
The leaders agreed to demand Japan's unconditional surrender and sent Japan the Potsdam Declaration.
Explanation:
PLATO :)
The question refers to the case Gibbons v. Ogden, a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The case dealt with the power to regulate interstate commerce.
<u>Because Aaron Ogden had a state license in New York, he believed that steamboat operators without a license needed to stay out of New York waters.</u> Gibbons, however, believed he also had the right to navigate these waters as Cogress had began to regulate commerce in coastal areas. The Supreme Court sided with Gibbons, as they believed this to be a case not only of state trade but of the country's economic well-being.
Answer:
Unconstitutional
Explanation:
In this case, the court ruled limiting students from attending certain school because of their race was violating the 14th amendment.
Answer:
D. Atomic programs.
Explanation:
None of the Asian Tigers ever developed nuclear weapons of its own. American pressures did not allow the launching of native atomic weapons programs in Taiwan and South Korea; they, as Japan, were under the nuclear umbrella of the United States (Taiwan only until 1979-1980). In Hong Kong and Singapore, it was not an issue.
