Identify the error in this works-cited entry for a print article in a magazine with no author. "It Fell from the Sky." Business
Week: 4 Mar, 2010. Pp 1-3. Incorrect punctuation between items incorrect punctuation of titles incorrect anonymous author identification incomplete information
The correct answer is your first option: Incorrect punctuation between items.
Explanation:
When citing a magazine article, <u>the colon must be </u><u>after</u><u> the year</u>, not after the magazine’s name. This is the reason why the punctuation between items is incorrect. It should be:
"It Fell from the Sky." Business Week 4 Mar, 2010: Pp 1-3.
The punctuation of titles is perfect. The incorrect anonymous author identification cannot be possible, as it only mentions “with no author” in this case, we start with the article title; in the case that the article had finished with “Anonymous”, then the citation would’ve started with the word “anonymous” and then the article title. And the last option: incomplete information, is not possible as everything is perfect, there’s nothing missing.
A reader could determine if a narrator is credible based on consistency of information : By examining the balance and consistency of information provided by the narrator. The information provided should be objective and consistent to the issues that stated in the narration