A powerful democracy whose people worry about giving up any political autonomy would be least likely to join an intergovernmental organization.
The correct response for this specific inquiry is choice D.
<u>Explanation:</u>
At the point when states join universal associations, they eagerly consent to certain confinements on its power. They surrender some sovereign power to the aggregate body. In this way, a ground-breaking nation that is hesitant to surrender political self-governance is the least extent liable to join an intergovernmental association.
As a nation with popularity based position and power, joining an intergovernmental association will make it lose its forces as it's an intergovernmental circumstance which makes the nation lose powers, for what reason would anybody decide to be controlled as opposed to be controlled? subsequently the appropriate response is option D.
When states join international organizations, they willingly agree to some limitations on its sovereignty. They cede some sovereign authority to the collective body. So, a powerful country that is reluctant to give up political autonomy is the least likely to join an intergovernmental organization.
