Seen him in a few minutes and I'll be there in a few minutes to talk to you
Answer:
B
Explanation:
They use either Ethos Logos or Pathos to make the reader join their side.
Answer:
b) Appeal to ignorance, present in an argument in which the arguer relies on the supposition that, due to a lack of conclusive evidence, the conclusion of an argument should be accepted.
Explanation:
The logical fallacy of appeal to ignorance is when an argument's conclusion is based on the absence of any evidence proving against it. In other words, an appeal to ignorance is when an arguer relies on the supposition that the lack of any evidence proving otherwise makes his conclusion acceptable and right.
In the given case of the existence of aliens, the speaker decides that <em>"[since] no one has yet been able to [prove that aliens exist]", </em>therefore, it must be true and accepted that <em>"aliens do not exist."</em> This argument follows the logical fallacy of an appeal to ignorance.
Thus, the correct answer is option b.
Of the four authors that have written books about Hurricane Katrina, the one that is most likely offering an objective account is B: a day-by-day account by a print journalist.
We might think that A is the correct answer because nobody could tell the experience like a person who lived in the place where the hurricane happened. Despite of this fact, he or she will tell his / her own experience and it might not be the experience of others. It will be a subjective account, truthful, but subjective.
On the other hand, a journalist who researched climate facts and consequences of the hurricane could give a more objective account. The journalist would show not one personal experience, but a lot of experiences from different families.
Answer: this is a complex sentence
Explanation:
this is a complex because it is dependent sentence joined with a independent sentence.
if you still don't get it William Humphreys,who was an American meteorologist is complete because it answers who William Humphreys is. the next sentence is dependent because figured out the probable answer 100 years later does not answer who fiqured out the probable answer 100 years later. hope this helps. correct me if i am wrong.
