For which project would a government leader most likely use a cost-benefit analysis?

2 answers:

8 0

Building a Water-Filtration plant near a reservoir. As the other 3 are government run. The water filtration plant would save the citizens taxes which means more spending money.

Umnica [9.8K]2 years ago

6 0

the answer is: building a water-filtration plant near a reservoir

Cost-benefit analysis was being done to make sure that the benefit that can be acquired from a certain project would outweigh the total expense needed to make that project happen.

projects that have really high cost and would affect largest number of people tend to be the one that most-likely used cost-benefit analysis. From the options , building a water-filtration plant near a reservoir would fulfill both criteria.

You might be interested in

URGENT!! SOMEONE PLS ANSWER WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

mojhsa [17]

Answer:

Control of both elective and appointed posts also gives a machine control of government salaries and revenues, which can be used to enrich the party at the public's expense

Explanation:

Hope this helps

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was the commerce and slave trade compromise?

Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

Under the Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise, Congress could not tax state exports or interfere with the slave trade until 1808.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which early American group of people constructed multistoried apartment-like complexes, called pueblo?

Kazeer [188]

This group of Native Americans were the Pueblo

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who is the president of the United States?

PolarNik [594]

Answer:

Donald Trump

Explanation:

The current president of the United States is Donald Trump.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which identifies the effects of the Congress of Vienna?

BartSMP [9]

Correct answer: C. The congress system if set up became a model for the United Nations.

Explanation:

My authority source for choosing answer C is the United Nations itself. UN Chronicle, the magazine of the United Nations, featured an article titled, "From the Congress of Vienna to Present-Day International Organizations" (December, 2014). That article asserts points such as these:

When did the process of international organization start?1 It was not in 1945 nor in 1919. Rather, it was the Congress of Vienna (1814-15) that proved to be the relevant turning point in history, when certain conditions allowed a number of European States to set in motion a series of innovations, inventions and learning processes that shaped the core of what we today refer to as international organizations (IOs).
The major innovation at Vienna was the follow-up conference. This new idea resulted in the custom of participating States to convene, upon reaching an agreement, a follow-up conference to assess whether previously agreed-upon decisions and policies had been executed. ... Consequently, since 1815, that innovative idea resulted in an ongoing cycle of conferences dealing with similar and related issues. Apart from continuity, the cycle produced incremental decision-making and path dependency with regard to selected common solutions and efforts.

5 0

2 years ago