Answer:
4) They needed money to pay for the french and Indian war.
Explanation:
<span>Many Americans believed that their economy was being purposefully harmed by British action. Added to this they felt that the British threatened their expansion into the west as forts on US land attempted to support and be at peace with Native Americans. A final issue was impressment, where the British forced young American sailors into their own royal navy.</span>
this was answered by Chiamakaokwu0p319a4 on January 26, 2018
The former empire of Austria-Hungary had dissolved and many new nations were formed from its land. Austria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary & Yugoslavia. The Ottoman Turks had to give up almost all of their land in southwest Asia and the Middle East. They only had the country of Turkey left. Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8433761#readmore
Bryan was the last of the Great Political Orators in some ways. He could speak at great length on any topic, using powerful imagery, often of a religious nature, to audiences raised on such language and imagery.
Unfortunately, the telegraph already was encouraging economy of language, and the radio would make long speeches less useful than shorter ones which reached the point quickly. People in churches no longer spent hours listening to a single sermon, and those who followed the earsteps of Abraham Lincoln learned that eloquence was not a matter of length, but of substance.
The “Cross of Gold” speech which he thought would propel him to the Presidency would not work today.
The only orators today who speak interminably tend to be dictatorial in nature, in love with their own voice, and whose followers dote on every word, no matter how repetitious. Bryan was leagues above that, but someone who seeks his skill will learn why society has passed the skills of the long-sermoned preacher by.
Answer:
China’s greater involvement with world grain trade; through greater reliance on grain imports, China will pay less for grain than it would adhering to strict self-sufficiency. Despite potentially mutual benefits, however, the successful transition of China’s grain policy will be impossible without a favorable environment at both internal and external levels. China’s movement toward trade liberalization is confronted with China’s concerns over its food security, possible farmer unemployment, and international payments. To aid China in overcoming many difficulties, measures taken by the international community will be crucial to encourage a smooth transition in China’s grain trade policy.
Explanation:
