The level of racking that should be stocked first would be the top bay, followed by the middle bay, and the last level to be stocked would be the bottom bay. It's simpler to remember, "top, middle, then bottom" when putting away pallets of freight into multiple depth drive-in bays. I hope this helps!
Answer:
$43.19
Explanation:
Use dividend discount model(DDM) to solve this question; specifically constant dividend growth model.
P0 = D1/(r-g)
P0 = Current price
D1 = Next year's dividend = $3.11
r = investors' required return = 11.4% or 0.114 as a decimal
g = dividend growth rate = 4.2% or 0.042 as a decimal
P0 = 3.11/(0.114 - 0.042)
P0 = $43.19
Therefore, this stock price is $43.19
Based on the fact that different states were involved, the matter can be heard b) both in federal court and in state court.
<h3>Jurisdiction of the case </h3>
- Texas has jurisdiction because the incident happened in Texas.
- Oklahoma might have jurisdiction because the vendor is from Oklahoma.
- The federal government also has jurisdiction because the matter involves two states and a workplace injury.
You are therefore free to pursue the matter at both federal and state level which makes option B correct.
Find out more on federal jurisdictions at brainly.com/question/3629164.
I'm going full have to go with 2, 3, & 4
Decision-making problems that could occur when using absorption costing include inappropriate __<u>pricing</u>____ decisions, and decisions made to ___<u>drop</u>___ products that are, in fact, profitable.
<h3>What is absorption costing?</h3>
Absorption costing is the costing method that includes both direct and indirect costs in the costs of a product.
It is the opposite of variable or marginal costing, which takes into account only the direct costs in determining the product cost.
Thus, the decision-making problems with absorption costing include <u>pricing</u> decisions and decisions involving whether to <u>drop</u> profitable products.
Learn more about absorption costing at brainly.com/question/26276034