It should be noted that a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to let stand the decisions of other government branches is known as judicial activism.
On the other hand, a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to overturn decisions or rule actions by the other branches unconstitutional, especially in an attempt to broaden individual rights and liberties, is called judicial restraint.
Judicial restraint simply means the power of judicial review to set aside government acts. On the other hand, judicial restraint simply means the refusal to strike down such acts.
Learn more about judicial review on:
brainly.com/question/4937540
Answer:I think it is a base
Explanation:.
Answer:
Popular Sovereignty
Explanation:
The Progressive Era was a period of social activism and political reform in which many civilians participated (direct democracy) in order to reform the vertical (hierarchy) political system. Among the targets were the political machines with their corrupt and malfunctioning representatives.
Popular Sovereignty, that dates back to the Enlightenment, is the purest of (and most horizontal) democratic government, in the sense that the goverment´s purpose should be to protect (the civil rights) and serve the people, and not the other way around. And if they fail to do, or are corrupt or both, so they should be replaced.
Answer:
Reformers wanted to make Native Americans like whites—to “Americanize” them. The Dawes Act, passed in 1887, was intended to encourage Native Americans to give up their traditional ways and become farmers. The act divided reservations into individual plots of land for each family.
Answer:
<em>Hello, your answer will be Tinker v. Des Moines. Hope That Helps! Why The Answer is Tinker V. Des Moines? Because The Internet breaks the mold The restrictions were short-lived the Supreme Court held that the restrictions on both the “display” and “transmission” of indecent communications online violate the First Amendment. And Why Did The Supreme Court the Communications Decency Act unconstitutional? Because it attempted to protect children by suppressing speech that adults have a constitutional right to receive.Th e Supreme Court did not rule on the issue, dismissing the case on a technical matter. Hope That Helps!</em>
<em>From Itsbrazts.</em>
