The Fair Housing Act of 1968 had little effect on housing segregation because its enforcement mechanisms were very weak.
<h3>What is the significance of the Fair Housing Act?</h3>
The Fair Housing Act came into effect in the United States in the year 1968 with the purpose of eliminating the discriminative practices involved in the sale, rent and/or lease of properties based on races.
However, the foundation of the Fair Housing Act, 1968 was considered as very weak, because the Civil Rights Act allowed for the public to keep distance from the American minority groups.
Hence, option B holds true regarding the Fair Housing Act.
Learn more about Fair Housing Act here:
brainly.com/question/12832875
#SPJ1
Do you have the options? If not I'd say European Imperialism was started by Portugal.
Answer:
Chandragupta probably abdicated, became an ascetic, accompanied Bhadrabahu to Karnataka and later died by following the ritual of sallekhana, i.e., fasting till death. Chandragupta thus ruled for 24 years and was succeeded by his son Bindusara (297- c. 273 BCE), father of Ashoka the Great (268-232 BCE)
Explanation:
In his book, A People's History of the United States, Howard Zinn cites examples from US colonial history of the gap between rich and poor in colonial life.
A key study cited by Zinn examined tax registers from Boston, showing that the top 1% of the population held 25% of the wealth in 1687, and that by 1770, the top 1% of property owners in Boston owned 44% of the wealth. The study also noted that the bulk of Boston's population were not property owners. The percentage of adult males in Boston who owned no property doubled between 1687 and 1770 (from 14% to 29%).
Zinn cited additional items, regarding overcrowding of poorhouses (giving a notable example from New York) and a general increase throughout the colonies of the "wandering poor" who had no real means of support. He also cited examples of workers' strikes against employers in the colonies because of low wages.