1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadya68 [22]
3 years ago
5

PLEASE! I NEED HELP! QUICKLY, MULTIPLE CHOICE!"Have we the means of resisting disciplined armies, when our only defense, the mil

itia, is put into the hands of Congress?"
Patrick Henry made this statement in his speech at the Virginia Ratifying Convention. The purpose of the speech was to explain why he opposed ratifying the Constitution without a Bill of Rights.
Why did Patrick Henry make this statement at the Virginia Ratifying Convention?

a. To support the idea that Congress would be better at managing a military than the people would

b. To support the idea that the people need a right to bear arms as a means of defending themselves

c. To emphasize the importance of state militias in international conflicts

d. To emphasize that Congress would be poor at managing a national military
History
2 answers:
forsale [732]3 years ago
7 0
B. To support the idea that the people need a right to bear arms as a means of defending themselves
SOVA2 [1]3 years ago
4 0

the answer would be b in


You might be interested in
Was Buchanan’s victory a landslide
VashaNatasha [74]

Answer:

No, Buchanan's victory was not a landslide one.

Explanation:

James Buchanan was the 15th President of the United States, elected on November 4, 1856. In that election he defeated John C. Fremont, of the Republican Party, and Millard Fillmore, of the Know Nothing Party.

In the popular vote, he obtained 45.28% of the votes, compared to 33.11% for Fremont and 21.54% for Fillmore. He obtained a greater distance in the electoral vote, but in no way was it a huge difference, but rather a fairly balanced electoral contest between the different participating forces. Therefore, in no way can it be said that his triumph was a landslide victory.

5 0
3 years ago
After overthrowing a monarch the Romans established a form of government called a republic which which of these statements descr
andre [41]

The Roman Republic (Latin: Res publica Romana; Classical Latin: [ˈreːs ˈpuːb.lɪ.ka roːˈmaː.na]) was the era of ancient Roman civilization beginning with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire. It was during this period that Rome's control expanded from the city's immediate surroundings to hegemony over the entire Mediterranean world.

During the first two centuries of its existence, the Roman Republic expanded through a combination of conquest and alliance, from central Italy to the entire Italian peninsula. By the following century, it included North Africa, most of the Iberian Peninsula, and what is now southern France. Two centuries after that, towards the end of the 1st century BC, it included the rest of modern France, Greece, and much of the eastern Mediterranean. By this time, internal tensions led to a series of civil wars, culminating with the assassination of Julius Caesar, which led to the transition from republic to empire.

The exact date of transition can be a matter of interpretation. Historians have variously proposed Julius Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon River in 49 BC, Caesar's appointment as dictator for life in 44 BC, and the defeat of Mark Antony and Cleopatra at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC. However, most use the same date as did the ancient Romans themselves, the Roman Senate's grant of extraordinary powers to Octavian and his adopting the title Augustus in 27 BC, as the defining event ending the Republic.

Roman government was headed by two consuls, elected annually by the citizens and advised by a senate composed of appointed magistrates. As Roman society was very hierarchical by modern standards, the evolution of the Roman government was heavily influenced by the struggle between the patricians, Rome's land-holding aristocracy, who traced their ancestry to the founding of Rome, and the plebeians, the far more numerous citizen-commoners. Over time, the laws that gave patricians exclusive rights to Rome's highest offices were repealed or weakened, and leading plebeian families became full members of the aristocracy. The leaders of the Republic developed a strong tradition and morality requiring public service and patronage in peace and war, making military and political success inextricably linked. Many of Rome's legal and legislative structures (later codified into the Justinian Code, and again into the Napoleonic Code) can still be observed throughout Europe and much of the world in modern nation states and international organizations.


If This Helped Mark Me Brainlest Please!:)


5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following groups of people was the square deal not intended to benefit? A.laborers B.big bussiness trusts C. Farmer
Lyrx [107]
B big bussinesses i belive so


6 0
3 years ago
Describe the effects of some of the
Goshia [24]

<u>Answer</u>:

The gulf coastal plains consists of most of the Eastern and Southern factions of Texas. This region is surrounded by terrain, pine, hardwood forests and three large rivers - the Brazos, Colorado and the Trinity.

Due to this, it suffers from hot and humid climate most of the year and it is estimated that it rains around 35 inches per year. The winters are often mild with very less amount of rain. This makes this region vulnerable to hurricanes and suffers a lot of hurricanes per year.

4 0
3 years ago
The addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution was to centralize government control over natural rights. True False 4​
DedPeter [7]

It is a false statement that the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution was to centralize government control over natural rights.

<h3>What is the Bill of Rights?</h3>

It means first 10 amendments to the Constitution which give people important rights such as freedom of speech.

The main purpose of the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution are:

  • to spells out rights in relation to their government.
  • to guarantees civil rights and liberties to the individual
  • to sets rules for due process of law
  • to reserves all powers not delegated to the Federal Government to the people or the States.

Therefore, It is a false statement that the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution was to centralize government control over natural rights.

Read more about Bill of Rights

brainly.com/question/493206

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Federalist Papers were written to encourage A) the adoption of the Bill of Rights. B) the ratification of the Constitution.
    14·2 answers
  • ''Circuit riders were clergy identified with which religion?'' What religion where they?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution?
    13·1 answer
  • How does war change people
    10·1 answer
  • Brian writes a series of papers in favor of the new Constitution. He is most likely _____.
    14·2 answers
  • The primary role of the united nations is to ________.
    15·2 answers
  • List the branch of history and government that deals with the study of rulling and systems of administration​
    13·1 answer
  • What is paleolithic?<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • what made the journeys of vasco da gama bartholomeu dias and christopher columbus possible in the 1400/
    11·1 answer
  • The French and Indian War was a war between which two groups:
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!