Answer:
it controls which sources to use.
1. (It was an example)
2.Did you know John is planning to call a meeting?
3.Do you know if they`ve ever had hit a single before?
4.I want to know when your leaving (can`t use a question mark for this one)
5.I doubt he told the truth (cant use a question mark here)
6.Could you tell me where the nearest swimming pool is?
7.She wondered who left that message on the answerphone (cant use a question mark)
8.He wanted to know what time they were due to arrive (cant use a question mark here)
Hope this helps :)
Don’t click links in this app a lot of people use them to spread viruses and the like. If I were given a drug which extended my lifetime to such a high degree, it would affect my life in many ways. I would consider my plans more loosely and allow myself more time for things; I would plan my career slowly and take my time to learn and do what I want rather than forcing myself to choose a career young. I’d experiment and find out what I like; if I have a dream job I’d go for it when, otherwise, I would’ve chosen something more stable. I would probably still get married although I’d be more careful, as I’d live long enough to see them die and have to live without them the rest of my long life, which would affect me a lot. This goes for other people too; relationships would seem much more precious because of how short they are for me. I’d care a lot more and be ready to protect my friends because their lives would seem so temporary to me. I would still seek close relationships of course, they’d just seem much more fragile and precious to me. I would probably not have children though I don’t plan on it anyways, but outliving them would make me sad. Either way if I want to have children in the future it wouldn’t matter that much how long I lived. I would take my health seriously until I get old enough that a normal person would’ve died; then I’d be more reckless since if I die, it’ll just be the same as if I never had the experimental drug. I would enjoy a longer life which sates my curiosity, allows me to take my time, and allows me to spend more time doing things I love and trying new things. However, a longer life span would mean outliving those I love— and as a result having to deal with much more grief and loss than if I lived a normal lifespan. Longer lifespans would give more of the human experience; an experience full of every range of emotions. If I were to live 150 years rather than 90 or so, the only difference would be that I experience more of both grief and happiness; that I go through more losses and more joys, more ups and more downs, than normal. But to some the human experience, even with all of the losses, would be worth living even a little longer. This thought experiment provides a lesson about fragility of human lives, and how that makes lives seem much more precious and important. It also provides the question of what the human experience truly is— a rollercoaster with ups and downs, no matter how long it is. In my opinion, something worth having in any way possible.
The correct answer is A. She didn’t know—yet—how to cast the body part of a living animal
Explanation:
In the passage from "Bone Detective," the author explains the challenge Diane faces as she is asked to make casts on a living tiger. In this context, one of the details that show this is a challenge for Diane and she is willing to solve problems is "She didn’t know—yet—how to cast the body part of a living animal" because the section "she didn't know" shows her lack of experience in working with living animals and therefore how challenging this is. However, this is contrasted by the word "yet" that shows she will figure out how to this and by the end, she will know how to make casts in living animals.
