Answer:
$730 and 3.53%
Explanation:
Given that
Initial Price = $103.39
Ending Price = $106.69
Dividend Paid = $0.35
Number of Shares owned = 200
The computation of the dollar return and the percent return is shown below:
Dollar return is
= [0.35 + ($106.69 - $103.39)] × 200
= $730
And, the percentage return is
= $730 ÷ (200 × $103.39)
= 3.53%
Answer:
A) A test with a high cost may also be of high value.
Explanation:
A test's cost add up to the time spent in preparing that test. S much time might have really been spent on it like researching, sitting, time spent, revaluation of the test, as well as other contributions made for the execution of that test. The value of the test can be evaluated to the resources spent for the test. When a test has a high cost, it may also have a high value depending on some variables relating to both the cost of the test as well as its value. Also, every individual's primary objective is usually cost minimization and profit maximization in every thing he does irrespective of type or structure.
By questioning the proposal done by Hugh, Irene showed the characteristic of being able to scrutinize properly certain things. This attitude is helpful especially when we are in doubt of the certain subject. By doing so, we can help those who proposed it to further do improvements on the certain subject.
Answer:
Real Surplus is $200 billion
Explanation:
Inflation = 14%
Debt = $4 trillion = $4,000 billion
Nominal deficit = $360 billion
Real Deficit = Nominal deficit - (Inflation*Debt)
= $360 - 14% * 4,000
= $360 - 560
= -$200
Hence, the answer is Real Surplus of $200 billion
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
