Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer: The Catholic Church responded to the challenges of Luther, Calvin, and the Protestant movement initially in a somewhat mild way, allowing Luther to argue his position. When Luther refused to retract his position, his theses were deemed heretical, he was excommunicated, and, after the Diet of Worms, support of Luther was prohibited.
Explanation: Have a good day. Brainliest? :D
Answer:
Explanation:
Euphrates and the Tigris.
The Mongols were terrifying warriors. However merchants leading caravans welcomed their conquest of Central Asia and China because they had a more favorable attitude toward merchants and commerce.
This was as a result of their nomadic way of life, which is much reliant on trade with sedentary peoples, and had caused them to recognize the importance of trade from the very earliest times.
One of the major reasons behind the Mongol conquest was due to the spoils of war. As their army grew, Genghis Khan and his son continued conquering and capturing cities in other to provide for the ever growing population.
<h3>Who were the Mongols?</h3>
The Mongols were citizens of Mongol empire, which was founded by Genghis Khan in 1206.
This empire Originated from the Mongol heartland in present day Mongolia, central Asia, and by the late 13th century it had stretched from the Pacific Ocean in the east to the Danube River and the shores of the Persian Gulf in the west.
Learn more about Genghis Khan at brainly.com/question/24018
#SPJ1
Direct democracy (also known as pure democracy) is a form of democracy in which people decide policy initiatives directly. This differs from the majority of modern Western-style democracies, which are indirect democracies.
Hope it helped!
