Two years ago, I set a goal of doubling U.S. exports over five years.
The Nuremberg Trials were a significant event in world history, as members of the Nazi party who were responsible for the systematic killing of European Jews were found guilty and ultimately sent to death.
This trial, conducted by members of the Allied powers, set a huge precedent for the world. After this trial, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was created. This stated that all humans around the world are guaranteed certain rights. Along with this, the United Nations Genocide Convention was developed. This helped to bring justice to those groups who committed atrocities all over the world. This body would be used to bring criminals who committed genocide to justice and became active after 1951.
One of history's first true super powers, the Persian Empire stretched from the borders of India down through Egypt and up to the northern borders of Greece. But Persia's rule as a dominant empire would finally be brought to an end by a brilliant military and political strategist, Alexander the Great.
Answer:
Tartars
Explanation:
Europeans commonly refered to the Mongols as "Tartars", Tartarus is the root word for "hell" so the nickname literally means "people from Hell".
A concession refers to a situation in which you acknowledge the fact that an opposing point of view might have some merits. On the other hand, a rebuttal occurs when you are able to prove that the opposite opinion is flawed, making your argument stronger.
This is an example of a concession in the Declaration of Independence:
- <em>Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.</em>
This quote is a concession because it accepts the argument of the opposing side. In this quote, the authors argue that prudent people agree that government should not be easily altered. They also argue that people often suffer greatly when their usual way of living is extremely changed. This argument seems to go against the purposes of the Revolution.
This is an example of a rebuttal:
- <em>But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.</em>
In this passage we learn that, although the authors agree with the previous argument, they also believe that the Revolutionary War is not one of these cases, as the English government has been excessively cruel and abusive, which gives the revolutionaries the right to defend themselves.