1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Irina18 [472]
4 years ago
6

Does an honorable warrior ever act as a sniper?

History
2 answers:
Colt1911 [192]4 years ago
7 0

it all depends if its his/her job to be a sniper. if so then yes. if not then no.

slavikrds [6]4 years ago
3 0

It truly depends.

There have been countless times that soldiers have saved their brothers in arms as snipers, which can be extremely honorable. Most of the time, TV portrays "honorable" warriors as guerrilla fighters, rambos, or other people who save lives. Snipers save lives.

In my opinion, yes, an honorable warrior can act as a sniper.

You might be interested in
Examine the locations of the following nations. Which of these nations is least likely to guard the Gulf of Mexico?
levacccp [35]
Most definitely Canada
8 0
3 years ago
How did people in the early for North America survive
lys-0071 [83]
The first Americans were hunters, gatherers, and fishermen, and this way of life continued in tropical rainforests and cold northern woods. Other peoples became farmers. In the Andes of South America they grew potatoes and herded llama. In fertile river valleys, MOUND BUILDERS grew corn, beans, and squash. In semideserts, the PUEBLO people farmed irrigated fields.
5 0
4 years ago
Explain why a group taking a vote on something is an example of direct democracy.
nevsk [136]

Answer:

A group of people taking a vote on something is an example of direct democracy because they are acting without an intermediary.

Please recall that direct democracy is defined as a form of democracy whereby people make political decisions directly.

7 0
3 years ago
If there was no civil war, would America still have slavery?
Tems11 [23]

This is one of those questions that is near impossible to answer.

The best I can give you, based upon my reading, is that it is likely that slavery would have continued for quite a while longer. Over time, though, it would have held a diminished role in society as the South industrialized. The advent of the assembly line would have further pushed the decline.

Holding slaves was a morally bankrupt AND expensive endeavor. For a long time, the cost benefit analysis for slave owners was that they could get years of work out of a person without wages. Eventually, with technology, this would have made the institution less of a good "investment," combined with moral pressure as most of the Western world divested itself from slavery.

So, you'd likely see a more pronounced version of our de facto slavery with migrant farm workers in the United States.

6 0
4 years ago
Which describes Patrick Henry Sam Adams and Thomas Paine
Elden [556K]
Patriots who helped <span>spark the American Revolution.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Daltons theory was identified using ​
    9·2 answers
  • What was Abigail Adams's opinion of owning enslaved workers?
    9·1 answer
  • What was one major impact of the Protestant Reformation on western Europe?
    5·2 answers
  • What are the right of the acussed
    7·1 answer
  • You read about a proposed amendment to require all students to remain in high school until they are able to pass all required co
    9·1 answer
  • The 24th Amendment to the Constitution made __________ illegal in the United States.
    8·2 answers
  • 50 POINTS TEXAS HISTORY
    5·2 answers
  • Of the following are true about the Populist Party EXCEPT:
    15·2 answers
  • What are the two forces driving the global silver trading patterns from 1570-1750 ?
    13·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from chapter 29 of Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!