Answer:
The CPA rebuts the allegations
Explanation:
The Securities Act of 1933 requires that investors receive financial and other significant information regarding any and all securities being sold publicly and prohibits deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities. Therefore, since there was material misstatement or omission in the financial statements, the only chance the CPA has is if they rebut the allegations. Meaning that they provide actual evidence, such as physical statements or witnesses that contradict or nullify the evidence that is being presented against them regarding the material misstatement or omission
Answer:
No. She suffered no physical impact
Explanation:
Negligent infliction of emotional distress occurs when a person engages in an act that can cause severe emotional distress to another .
The plaintiff must be able to prove that the act was done willfully or provide an evidence that
- It was a result of defendant's negligence
- Plaintiff suffered emotional distress a direct result of the action
- The action was foreseeable by the defendant
- The plaintiff was in a danger zone
before he can win a claim.
The question here is how to prove emotional stress? The plaintiff must be able to show a verifiable physical injury that is linked to the emotional distressed suffered.
The answer is A "Colonial merchants once nailed advertisements on posts in front of their stores." please marl me as brainliest
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one:
(1) <span>B)People prefer tangible items, so the government would not be able to satisfy demand for the tangible item at any fixed rate of exchange
</span>(2) <span>B)Potential buyers of the assets of a bank, incorrectly rumored to be distressed, may suspect the assets to be of poor quality.
</span>(3) <span>C) The Federal Reserve ("the Fed") stands ready to inject reserves into the system more quickly in a crisis.
</span>(4) <span>A)Checkable Deposits / Required Reserves</span>
