Sapa Inca - The emperor or king of the Inca Empire was called the Sapa Inca, which means "sole ruler". He was the most powerful person in the land and everyone else reported to the Sapa Inca. His principal wife, the queen, was called the coya. Below the Sapa Inca were several officers who helped to rule the empire.
C. Shiloh
First Battle of Bull Run
Battle of Shiloh
Vicksburg Campaign
Jackson Expedition
Chattanooga Campaign
Meridian Campaign
Atlanta Campaign
Savannah Campaign (March to the Sea)
Carolinas Campaign
<span>Battle of Bentonville</span>
I'll give you some thoughts on the political views of the thinkers named. It's up to you to search for images and write your descriptions.
Aristotle believed there were three valid types of government, depending on the size and scope of what was to be governed or upon local situations. (He studied the constitutions of various governments as part of his work in writing <em />his work, <em>Politics.</em>) As state with a sole ruler ruling rightly is a monarchy. If that form of state is abused, it becomes tyranny. A state with a number of members of the ruling class is an aristocracy -- rule by the excellent ones, noble men suited for governing. If it is corrupted by having a few rule but not of noble character or in a noble way, Aristotle referred to that as an oligarchy (rule by a few). A state in which all worthy men participate in governing Aristotle termed a polity, a constitutional government. He saw it as a corruption, though, to have a full democracy (rule by the people), which would become the sort of thing we call mob rule.
Aquinas picked up thoughts from Aristotle, who had favored a monarchy. Aquinas, writing from a Christian perspective, wrote about the righteous and proper sort of ruler who would serve as God's appointed leader among the people, truly caring for them (not becoming a tyrant).
Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx were partners in establishing communism as a political ideology. Engels and Marx believed that in time, class struggles between overlords and those beneath them would give way to a society in which all ruled and lived and worked collectively.
Answer:
In my opinion, skyscrapers have a negative effect on modern life.
Explanation:
I think there are multiple reasons that skyscrapers have a negative affect. But one is that there are usally multiple businesses inside of them, wich means that a large amount of people need to get there, wich leads to more cars and other transportation. Wich then causes air polution.
(don't know if this was the type of answer you were looking for.)
1. Answer = C
2. Answer= C
3. Answer= A
