The Appointments Clause [of Article II] clearly implies a power of the Senate to give advice on and, if it chooses to do so, to consent to a nomination, but it says nothing about how the Senate should go about exercising that power. The text of the Constitution thus leaves the Senate free to exercise that power however it sees fit. Throughout American history, the Senate has frequently – surely, thousands of times – exercised its power over nominations by declining to act on them.
You mean what possible advantage could Oligarchy have?
Oligarchy could mean that people in power will have good education and for example won't be manipulated by populists. For example often people choose their representatives based on very little information, and in an oligarchy, where a small portion of a society (the riches and best educated) rules, it could be more likely that the rulers will have the necessary education and preparaation.
Answer: that there could be only one legitimate ruler of China at a time, and that this ruler had the blessing of the gods.
Explanation:
The correct answer is case study.
A case study is a method of psychological research that involves collecting in-depth information and data about an individual person or animal. Information gathered from case studies can be from a combination of questionnaires, interviews, observations etc. Case studies can be conducted when investigating any psychological phenomena, however, they are most useful when investigating psychological or mental disorders.
