Prisoner's dilemma - is a two-person scenario in which (1) Player A stands to benefit more from a transaction by acting selfishly toward Player B if B offers to collaborate, and vice versa; but, (2) A and B together might obtain a bigger total payoff by collaborating than by acting selfishly in both cases. The typical result of a Prisoner's Dilemma is that both players act selfishly, which results to a poor decision for both.
With this system, one may strike a balance between rivalry and competitive for the benefit of all parties.
According to game theory, a situation where two players act selfishly would ultimately lead to a poor decision or getting smaller rewards for both is known as a prisoner's dilemma. The prisoner's dilemma also demonstrates the fact that sometimes, collaboration is not the best course of action.
To learn more about Prisoner's dilemma, refer
brainly.com/question/22597804
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. The governor was appointed by the proprietor, and the legislature is unicameral. Each year, they were elected by male, white men who owned property, so if you didn't fit under those categories, you didn't get a say in elections.
2. The first right was that no taxes were to be levied without consent of Parliament, (2) No subject may be imprisoned without cause shown (reaffirmation of the right of habeas corpus), (3) No soldiers may be quartered upon the citizenry, and (4) Martial law may not be used in time of peace.
Hope it helps!!
Explanation:
They could not start a war against another colonie without a reason
Hoped this helped
I think the answer is the supreme court.
