If you're talking about one storm for each, then acid rain would erode more Because acid breaks down material much easier then water.
(amusing they are falling at the same speed)
I don't think we can answer this question just like that. The question should be formulated a bit differently:
WHAT is in danger from the effects of overfishing?
Well, in the end of the "effect-spectrum" we are in danger, since we also eat fish. But the most affected species are the ones that form the aquatic ecosystems. Such as fish. Examples:
1 - Many of the fish we eat, feed on sea-weed. If there aren't enough fish to eat the growing population of sea-weed, many fish die of intoxication.
2 - We don't have almost any fish restrictions in a way, because we can eat basically all of them. Therefore, many fish (which are also being eaten) find themselves in a lack of food.
3 - Many times, we concentrate on a specific species, which is a main cause of the extinction of species.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
Answer:
B. Is what the scientists manipulate in the experiment.
Explanation:
The Independent variable is not dependent, or doesn't rely, on another variable in the experiment. So, it would make the most sense that they would manipulate the Independent so that they can watch and see how the dependent variable reacts to the manipulation, or the change, in the independent variable.
Explanation:
The structure labeled as x is the
<h3><u>nucleus</u>. </h3>
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>this helps</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Good luck</em><em>!</em><em>!</em>