<span>This discovery activity puts students in the place of real volcanologists by giving them access to real-time data from Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. They learn about volcano monitoring techniques, study case histories of important volcanic processes, and then form and test hypotheses for past and future volcanic events with multiple instruments and real-time data. As a result, students will understand the processes that shape a basaltic shield volcano.</span>
Answer:
A central theme of the poem is the strength displayed by the young men who play the game of basketball.
Explanation:
The poem Slam, Dunk, and Hook by Yusef Komunyakaa describe some young African Americans who play the game of basketball and the strength, energy, and vigor displayed by them. Descriptive and Sensory languages are word choices that appeal to our sense of sight, hearing, feeling, tasting, and touching. The poet uses this language to describe the vitality of these men. This can be seen in the following lines;
<em>'Nothing but </em><em>a hot
</em>
<em>Swish of strings like silk'</em><em> </em>
<em />
<em>Glistening with sweat,
</em>
<em>We rolled the ball off
</em>
<em>Our fingertips.</em>
<em />
<em>Trouble
</em>
<em>Was there </em><em>slapping a blackjack
</em>
<em>Against an open palm.</em>
<em />
<em>Muscles were </em><em>a bright motor
</em>
<em>Double-flashing </em><em>to the metal hoop</em>
The story of Doctor Reefy in "Paper Pills" by Sherwood Anderson depicts loneliness and is a curious story. The story's word "confound" shows confusion. Thus, option C is correct.
<h3>What is the meaning of 'confound?'</h3>
Confound is a word that shows confusion caused to someone because of a situation and even makes them dumfound because the situation occurred not according to their expectations.
Here Doctor Reefy threw a paper rock at the older man, John Spaniard to make him look confused and was his friend with whom he spent time at the nursery.
Therefore, option C. confuse is the correct meaning of the word confound.
Learn more about Paper Pills here:
brainly.com/question/14593213
#SPJ1
To support an argument by showing that because other courts have made similar decisions, the decision in the current case must be logical.
Like what? You need to provide more details. What am I being persuasive about?