Real estate experts should not provide advice
on tax implications. this is because to offer such an advice the expert need training and knowlidge on state and federal tax laws. Tax laws are complex and varies from state to state which requires a considerable high level training. ina ddition, the laws keep on changing as new budgets are read,and the expert may not be conversant with any change.
Answer:
A. participative budgeting
Explanation:
Participative budgeting -
It refers to the type of method of budgeting , where the person implementing the budget as well as the person getting affected by the budget are involved in the process of creating the budget , is referred to as participative budgeting .
In this method the top - level managers are supposed to share the decision of budgeting with the bottom - level managers as well .
Hence , from the given information of the question ,
The correct answer is A. participative budgeting .
Out of the roughly 142 million filers, people under the age of 35 account for 35 percent of all returns but just 17 percent of total AGI. By far, the largest number of filers are between the ages of 35 and 55, and they account for nearly half of total AGI
Answer:
See explanation section
Explanation:
When we need to close accounts, we close the income and expenses accounts. The reason to close those accounts is that those are temporary accounts. Drawings and dividends are also temporary as those accounts have to be settled through capital and retained earnings balance. Therefore,
We will close the entries to income summary are -
D. Depreciation Expense
E. Fees Earned
J. Supplies Expense
L. Wages expense.
The entry to close against a capital account is Drawings. Therefore, Jackie Lindsay, Drawing should be closed.
Answer: C - Jenny pays Abe $300 to give the dog to his parents who live on an isolated farm.
Explanation: Since the benefit of owning the dog is worth $200 to Abe and Jenny is willing to pay him $300 to send the dog to his parents who lives on an isolated farm. Abe stand to gain an extra $100 above his initial benefit of keeping the dog for $200.