Answer:
The answer is b: To help Europe's economy after the war. After World War 2, there were two superpowers: The United States and the Soviet Union. The soviet Union was bent on world domination, and when nations are in chaos, such as a lot of people are living in poverty, communism usually seems attractive. The United States was determined to keep Western Europe free, so the Marshall plan allowed the federal government to send funds and aid to any country being threatened by communist revolutionaries. Plz mark brainliest.
Explanation:
The differences that exists between welfare capitalism and classical liberalism is that:
- Welfare capitalism is directed towards the employers of labor while classical liberalism is directed towards the government.
- free market principles are mixed together with laws from a welfare state in welfare capitalism, while classical liberalism is about the limitation of the powers of the goverment.
- Classical liberalism is concerned with the protection of freedoms of citizens, welfare capitalism is mostly about the market.
<h3>What is classical liberalism?</h3>
This is a market system that is mostly about the laissez faire system in an economy. It is one that advocates for free markets.
<h3>What is the welfare capitalism in a country?</h3>
This is one that involves businesses and firms providing welfare services to the people that they employ.
Read more on classical liberalism here: brainly.com/question/12500157
Answer: Normative ethics would generally ask what right action is. ... Metaethics, on the other hand, would call into question what it means to say that any action is "correct", whether this type of evaluation is objective or subjective, universal or particular
Explanation :
Because it brought thousands to Nevada.
The following phrase most adequately describes the rule of law:
the definition of authority
Explanation:
The rule of law despite how it sounds does not mean to set of Order and rules that the law follows.
In fact, the statement is quite different and its stress is on a completely different set of things.
it is more of a guarantee of the law and its preceding ever other matter in terms of the rule over the country.
It is a phrase that in a sense states that the law has an authority over the people that cannot be compromised or tinkered with .
It is an affirmation of the rule of the law over its subjects.
