The steps in the PACED decision making model are define the problem, list alternatives, state criteria, evaluate alternatives, and make a decision.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u>Define the problem:</u> Identify what the problem is finding out how to solve it precisely.
<u>List alternatives:</u> Possibilities, solutions for the problems. There can be hundreds of alternatives in solving a Problem, it can be realistic or unrealistic. It’s up to an individual to choose the fastest and the most effective solution.
<u>State Criteria’s:</u> Criteria’s helps in judging the problem. Hence, we can have as many criteria’s we want, again it’s up to an individual how many criteria. He / She want to choose to solve the Specific problem. It’s one of the important factors because it helps us to peek & judge our best criteria and alternatives for solving the problem.
<u>Evaluate alternatives:</u> Its where we take the criteria & evaluate all our alternatives.
<u>Make decision:</u> Here we will look at the evaluation, criteria & alternative and add up the total. We should choose the best alternative we have the most realistic & logical alternative should be chosen to make a correct & most potent decision.
Answer: pretty sure its c dude
Explanation:
The expert testimony of forensic scientists are convincing because they use state of the art and cutting edge methods to determine different factors which is their job. They are able to tell, based on a fingerprint, to whom this fingerprint belonged, given that these people have the fingerprints in the first place in a database.
The right answer is most likely to be 2). The rest are assumptions that cannot be made due to a lack of supporting evidence, or just simply not mentioned.
