The conclusion of the excerpt is that the narrator does not have facts and that all information provided is only suggestive that the referenced persons seem to have taken advantage of insider information.
The central idea of this excerpt hence is that there is a red flag being raised on the possibility that certain persons may have breached ethical principles that prohibit insider trading.
<h3>
What is a central idea?</h3>
A central idea is the dominant thought to which all other parts of a text relate to.
<h3>What is insider trading?</h3>
Apart from its connection to fraud or breach of fiduciary responsibility, insider trading per se refers to making financial investments based on knowledge that is unknown to others.
Such behaviors obviously should be regarded as ethically reprehensible since they adversely impact other people.
<h3>How does insider trading hurt others?</h3>
Insider trading reduces investor returns by negatively affecting market liquidity and raising transaction costs.
Additionally, because so many individuals have a stake in the financial markets—roughly half of American households own stocks directly or indirectly—most Americans are harmed by this activity.
Learn more about ethical principles:
brainly.com/question/4475592
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. urgency for a decision
Explanation:
It shows Truman and him trying to make a decision before its too late
The predicate is the very and everything that follows after it, which could include adverbs, prepositional phrases, and other parts of speech. For example, "The dog ran across the street to the neighbor's house". Find the verb (the action or in your case, a linking verb such as is, are, was, wear, am). In my example, the verb is 'ran'. So the predicate is:
-ran across the street to the neighbor's house
For your sentence, the predicate is -was very strong.
Answer:
a he refuses to give any money to provide food and drink for the poor
I think it is either B or C. I'm not sure which one though. Hope this sorta helped. Have a great day! :D
