Answer:
A. The proposed measures would be unconstitutional. The goal of the electoral colleges was to avoid a dictatorship. However, in modern America, such concept is completely out of date. To that extent, changing the way the electoral college operates would need a change in the constitution itself.
B. The government might modify the constitution, or a section of the constitution dealing with the electoral college, to better reflect current American requirements. Our founding fathers actually proposed that the constitution be changed on a regular basis in order to accommodate these new-age principles.
C. A possible candidate would appeal to the masses and would be more population leaning than state leaning; states and cities with larger populations would receive more attention than more rural places; and more democratic and liberal leaning politicians would have a huge advantage because large cities and populations are their core demographic.
Explanation:
John Adams was the president who sacrificed his popularity.
Answer:
The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves "Federalists." Their adopted name implied a commitment to a loose, decentralized system of government. In many respects "federalism" which implies a strong central government was the opposite of the proposed plan that they supported.
Explanation:
The name for the process of determining the number of seats to which each state is entitled in the U.S. House of Representatives is "<span>apportion," although it is also known as "defining districts". </span>
I am pretty sure they did everything except force people to stay in jobs. I am not certain, though.
