Answer:
Explanation:
For statement 1. The unemployment rate is high as Tim must have tried is best and the labour force rate is also low because he gave up looking and retires, this must have an impact on labour force.
For statement 2, unemployment rate will reduce or a quota will contribute to the reduction of unemployment rate If she gets a job. And labour force will increase.
For statement 3, Brian decision will have a major negative impact on the unemployment rate and labour force because of lack of interest.
For statement 4, this is an accident which will definitely have an impact on unemployment rate and labour force, a live is lost.
The answer is functional-professional <span>touch.
</span>functional-professional touch refers to the type of touch to communicate something that solely related to the task at hand (not to build up emotional connection). It is important to be cautious in doing the functional-professional <span>touch in order to avoid mis-perception of unwanted advance.</span>
Tobacco, rice, and indigo were the southern colonies' most important cash crops. Cash crops were crops that were sold mainly for profit.
1. The Yalta Conference
2. The Marshall Plan
3. The formation of NATO
Answer:
A. All classes should have equal authority
Explanation:
The political activities of Pierre Joseph Proudhon (1809–1865) eventually landed him in a French prison, but Proudhon was not a man of violence. He called for the extension of democracy to all classes, to be accomplished through the elimination of property and government. Property was to be commonly held, and families living in extended communes were to replace centralized government. Proudhon’s philosophy would most appropriately classify him as an <u>all class should have equal authority</u>.
Proudhon was a French printer who proposed mutualism, he believes that all individual should have equal authority, claims and opportunity. Proudhon was also opposed to capitalism because he believes that its gives an individual undue advantage over others and saw the possession of private property as illegitimate when it gives a single individual excess power/advantage over others.
