1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alenkinab [10]
3 years ago
14

In 1840, if you wanted to move lumber from Cumberland, Maryland, to Washington, D.C., how would you transport it?

History
2 answers:
azamat3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

answer is b

Explanation:

dybincka [34]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is B. In 1840, to move lumber from Cumberland, Maryland, to Washington, DC, i would transported it by barge along the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal.

The Chesapeake-Ohio Canal was a canal of the Potomac River, active between 1831 and 1924, linking the cities of Washington D.C. and Cumberland (Maryland). It was used mainly to transport coal from the nearby Allegheny Mountains.

You might be interested in
How can two different historians come up with different versions of the past
Kryger [21]
Depends on the perspective they find the information and the how they find it .
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following democratic principles are shared by BOTH ancient Athens and the United States?
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

its B

Explanation:

I had the same question on my last quiz.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe affirmative gerrymandering and explain why it used?
kozerog [31]

Describe affirmative gerrymandering and explain why it is used. (2 points) It is used to create districts mostly made up of minority voters; the goal is to give these voters a better chance of electing someone who supports their interests.

3 0
3 years ago
Why might workers have been reluctant to hold a strike in the early years of the factory system?
DochEvi [55]
The main reason why workers would have been reluctant to hold a strike in the early years of the factory system is because there were few jobs available, and those with jobs did not want to risk losing them over a strike. 
4 0
3 years ago
Kennedy implies that starting a nuclear war would be insane. Why?
vlada-n [284]

I believe Kennedy implies this because starting a nuclear war would in the end kill everybody and their would be absolutely no reason to do one.

<em>Hope this helps, Kam</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did King Henry VIII have Thomas More beheaded? A. Thomas More believed in the teachings of Martin Luther. B. The king wanted
    13·1 answer
  • Why should William Henry Sheppard be remembered ?
    12·2 answers
  • The framers of the constitution believed that they created a government
    9·1 answer
  • Which helped make Spain the most economically powerful country in Europe during Philip II’s reign?
    9·2 answers
  • What allows goods and services flow more freely across the borders of the US, Canada, and Mexico?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did political parties form in the United States
    9·2 answers
  • How did great Britain try to control trade with the colonies and Europe
    12·1 answer
  • Catherine and matt are a north american couple with two children. which attitude is most likely suit their parenting style?
    6·1 answer
  • How did americans affect the end of WWI and it’s peace settlements
    13·1 answer
  • Was the attack on Pearl Harbor and US Casualties Justified for dropping the atomic bomb? Why or why not?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!