Answer:
hey hey heyday hey hey hey hey hey heyyyyyyyttt
Based on historical perspective, the South tried to justify the "<u>Chàttel Slàvery</u> by arguing that keeping slavery was a matter of states' rights, but the South also favored <u>Fúgitive Slàve Law</u> which took away Northern States' rights to protect enslaved people who had escaped to the North.
<h3>What is Chàttel Slàve?</h3>
The chàttel slàve is the form of slavery arrangement whereby an individual has the ownership of another man to work for him as he pleases, either at home or in fields.
During the debate on the abolition of slàvery between North and South, the Southern States argued that chàttel slàvery is no different than wage slàvery, and it should be the state's right to determine whether to be a slàve state or free state.
Again, during the debate, the south argued in favor of the <u>Fugitivé Slàve Law.</u> This law mandated Northerners to turn escaped slàves who moved to the North back over to their Southern owners, though it was against their rights to protect enslaved people.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Chàttel Slàvery and Fugitíve Slàve Law accordingly.
Learn more about the Fugítive Slàve Law here: brainly.com/question/9505313
Answer:
If they weren't allow to then they should be send to prison. They weren't allowed to so they must to send to prison.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. Searches and Seizures
2. Probable Cause
3. Illegal Search
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment states that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effect against unreasonable SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon PROBABLE CAUSE supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence cannot be admitted if it was gathered during ILLEGAL SEARCH.
