Answer:
...“The father of modern economics supported a limited role for government. Mark Skousen writes in "The Making of Modern Economics", Adam Smith believed that, "Government should limit its activities to administer justice, enforcing private property rights, and defending the nation against aggression." The point is that the farther a government gets away from this limited role, the more that government strays from the ideal path... How this issue is handled will decide whether the country can more closely follow Adam Smith's prescription for growth and wealth creation or move farther away from it.”
Jacob Viner addressed the laissez-faire attribution to Adam Smith in 1928...
Here is a list of appropriate activities for government, which goes way, way beyond Mark Skousen’s extremely limited – and vague – 'ideal' government. That ... he goes on to attribute his ‘ideal’ list to Adam Smith ... is not alright.In fact, its downright deceitful, for which there is no excuse of ignorance (before attributing the limited ideal to Adam Smith we assume, as scholars must, that Skousen read Wealth Of Nations and noted what Smith actually identified as the appropriate roles of government in the mid-18th century).
<span>Menes ( c. 3150 BC ) was a king of ancient Egypt. He united Upper and Lower Egypt and he was the founder of the First Dynasty, He also established the famous capital of Memphis. Akhenaten ( or Echnaton ) known at the start of his reign as Amenhotep IV was Egyptian Pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty ( 1319-1336 BC ). Akhenaten was ruler who tried to change traditional Egyptian polytheism and to introduce the worshiping of one God - the Aten ( the disk of the Sun ). Answer: B ) trying to change Egypt`s polytheistic religion to a monotheistic religion. </span>
Answer:
Our lives would be ENTIRELY different. "The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This shows that different religions would be unacceptable and freedom of speech wouldnt really be there. Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
The constitutional principle that was the main focus of the north south conflicts that led to the civil war was the right to own property, since many people in the South felt that slaves were included in terms of "property" that could not be taken away.
The role of New Netherland in the history of the United States of America. ... The seal of New Netherland ... represents an early attempt to set out the principle of religious toleration.
