cC) they both enjoy direct access to interests 85 and 95 which allow goods to be shipped between each other easier.
Answer:
it would likely overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive
Explanation:
Melissa's tugboat accidentally collides with Tyler's yacht, and Tyler sues Melissa for negligence. A federal jury finds Melissa liable and awards Tyler $5,000 in compensatory damages as well as $50 million in punitive damages. Melissa appeals to the United States Supreme Court, challenging the punitive damages award. If the Supreme Court heard the case, it would likely overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive because punitive damage are awarded if the compensatory damage are deem inadequate remedy and are awarded both to deter the defendant and others from conduct similar to the conduct that gave rise to the lawsuit.
Scalloped patterns of responding are typically associated with Fixed interval schedules. This is further explained below.
<h3>What are
Fixed interval schedules?</h3>
Generally, Fixed-interval schedules are ones in which the first answer will not be rewarded until a certain length of time has passed from the beginning of the schedule.
In conclusion, Responses that follow a scalloped pattern are often connected with programs that use fixed intervals.
Read more about Fixed interval schedules
brainly.com/question/12282349
#SPJ1
The crime control perspective
would be the justice perspective that this is referring to. This system
operates on a “for the greater good” belief, placing heavy sanctions upon the
criminal offenders and puts importance on the protection of the rest of
society.
I would say a but b might work as well
