1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Colt1911 [192]
3 years ago
15

Many of the finest painting of ancient india are found in temples. What can you infer

History
1 answer:
Charra [1.4K]3 years ago
6 0
Assuming you have to write an essay about this....

If the paintings are found in temples then maybe those paintings were used in the temple or even painted there.
 the point is there is no wrong answer for this question basically all you do is write your thoughts and if you need more words just expand on why you think this or that.
You might be interested in
Hitler and Stalin signed the Nazi-Soviet Nonaggression Pact because they:
Elenna [48]

Answer:

I think is is 4

Hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Why did Germany pass the Nuremberg Laws under Adolf Hilters leadership
jeyben [28]

Answer:

Two distinct laws passed in Nazi Germany in September 1935 are known collectively as the Nuremberg Laws: the Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. These laws embodied many of the racial theories underpinning Nazi ideology. They would provide the legal framework for the systematic persecution of Jews in Germany.

Adolf Hitler announced the Nuremberg Laws on September 15, 1935. Germany’s parliament (the Reichstag), then made up entirely of Nazi representatives, passed the laws. Antisemitism was of central importance to the Nazi Party, so Hitler had called parliament into a special session at the annual Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg, Germany. The Nazis had long sought a legal definition that identified Jews not by religious affiliation but according to racial antisemitism. Jews in Germany were not easy to identify by sight. Many had given up traditional practices and appearances and had integrated into the mainstream of society. Some no longer practiced Judaism and had even begun celebrating Christian holidays, especially Christmas, with their non-Jewish neighbors. Many more had married Christians or converted to Christianity.

According to the Reich Citizenship Law and many ancillary decrees on its implementation, only people of “German or kindred blood” could be citizens of Germany. A supplementary decree published on November 14, the day the law went into force, defined who was and was not a Jew. The Nazis rejected the traditional view of Jews as members of a religious or cultural community. They claimed instead that Jews were a race defined by birth and by blood.

Despite the persistent claims of Nazi ideology, there was no scientifically valid basis to define Jews as a race. Nazi legislators looked therefore to family genealogy to define race. People with three or more grandparents born into the Jewish religious community were Jews by law. Grandparents born into a Jewish religious community were considered “racially” Jewish. Their “racial” status passed to their children and grandchildren. Under the law, Jews in Germany were not citizens but “subjects" of the state.

This legal definition of a Jew in Germany covered tens of thousands of people who did not think of themselves as Jews or who had neither religious nor cultural ties to the Jewish community. For example, it defined people who had converted to Christianity from Judaism as Jews. It also defined as Jews people born to parents or grandparents who had converted to Christianity. The law stripped them all of their German citizenship and deprived them of basic rights.

To further complicate the definitions, there were also people living in Germany who were defined under the Nuremberg Laws as neither German nor Jew, that is, people having only one or two grandparents born into the Jewish religious community. These “mixed-raced” individuals were known as Mischlinge. They enjoyed the same rights as “racial” Germans, but these rights were continuously curtailed through subsequent legislation.

5 0
3 years ago
How might a dark colored, coarse soil be different from a reddish, smooth soil
Hunter-Best [27]
The minerals and elements in the soil.
5 0
3 years ago
What was President Pierce’s response to the election fraud in Kansas?
Finger [1]

Answer:

He refused to do anything.

Explanation:

Franklin Pierce was the United States President between 1853 to 1857. His administration was marred by a lot of controversies particularly the event known as Bleeding Kansas.

In 1855 during the election to determine if Kansas were to be added as a Slave state or not, the process was marred by fraud and eventually led to violence.

However, instead of doing anything about the violence, "Pierce refused to do anything." He chose to let the politics of Kansas be resolved by the residents, even though it was believed to lend toward the pro-slavery side.

8 0
3 years ago
Write a letter to King George Ill explaining who you believe the colonies in North
KengaRu [80]

will not diejskzkdkd of u uwnt

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How many European nation members are actively using the Euro currency?<br> 12<br> 14<br> 16<br> 18
    14·1 answer
  • how did you know What evidence does McCarthy provide to support his claims of Communists in the State Department?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the Pilgrims leave Europe to establish a new colony?
    11·1 answer
  • Who is in charge of imigration in america?
    8·1 answer
  • How did France's contributions help the Americans in the War of Independence? The British stopped fighting the Americans and onl
    9·1 answer
  • This Promise of the new deal for the American people was made by which US president
    14·1 answer
  • In the case roe v . wade, the supreme court ruled that state laws
    11·2 answers
  • how is twhat are the advantages and disadvantages of a city (in this example--a county--) assuming the responsibilities of gover
    12·1 answer
  • In the early 1930s, many farmers lost their land because they:
    5·1 answer
  • When a prisoner pleads the Fifth (5th), what does that mean?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!