1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rom4ik [11]
3 years ago
14

What was John Ross' approach to fighting against indian removal ?

History
1 answer:
zhenek [66]3 years ago
6 0

John Ross, a Cherokee Chief, Lithographic & Print Colouring Establishment, copyright 1843. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders.

You might be interested in
2.Who is historian ?​
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer:

oh its her

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This was a prime example of attempts to “Americanize” the Indians by treating
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

Reformers wanted to make Native Americans like whites—to “Americanize” them. The Dawes Act, passed in 1887, was intended to encourage Native Americans to give up their traditional ways and become farmers. The act divided reservations into individual plots of land for each family.

6 0
2 years ago
The map highlights the british empire and its telegraph system. what advantage over other nations did britain have because of it
IRISSAK [1]
<span>Britain could rule its large territory with direct, immediate communication.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help I am so confused on this
Kitty [74]

I believe tha you are correct!

----

They did not have access to metal tools, they didn't build permanent homes because they had to constantly be on the move to find food, they weren't equal. The men were seen as superior to the women. SO that leaves you with the only option of RARELY SHARED FOOD WITH OTHERS. They didn't share food with other tribes because what food they had was barely enough to feed their own tribe.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was responsible for the outbreak of WWI? Defend your answer with evidence.
BigorU [14]

Answer:

The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the immediate cause of a war between two great powers—Russia and the Habsburg Austro-Hungarian Empire.

Explanation:

The war was started by the leaders of Germany and Austria-Hungary. Vienna seized the opportunity presented by the assassination of the archduke to attempt to destroy its Balkan rival Serbia

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of lincoln's statements did not hold true?
    6·2 answers
  • examine the orgins of American invovement in the war with an emphasis on the events that precipitated the attack on pearl harbor
    13·1 answer
  • Why were many people in the Georgia Colony slow to support the American Revolution at first?
    10·1 answer
  • Most illegal drug use has declined since the 1970s in the United States.<br><br> True<br><br> False
    15·2 answers
  • What kinds of animals are in the photograpgh what to think they are used for​
    10·1 answer
  • What event signaled the shift and directional change of the SNCC? Malcolm X was assassinated in 1965. The Black Panther Party wa
    5·2 answers
  • Possesses help me get this right
    14·1 answer
  • In the South, the invention of the cotton gin:
    14·2 answers
  • ASAP, WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!
    15·1 answer
  • Out of 150 150 offspring born to a gray, short fin fish crossed to a long finned, blue fish heterozygous for both traits, how ma
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!