Answer:
Legal approach of green management Utilimotors use
Explanation:
we use here Legal approach
because Legal approach is the type of green management approach and which is simply following that what is required by the law
and They try to comply with the current laws and regulations
but do not go anything further.
so here Utilimotor is using the legal approach by following the EPA regulation and ensuring to release emissions only within the permissible limit
so Legal approach of green management Utilimotor use
This relates to liability of business owners. When a company has unlimited liability and starts losing money, the owners can be personally liable for losses meaning their home and personal assets could be lost. Limited liability means they can only lose the amount that they invested in the company and none of their personal assets.
Answer:
Beginning RE 708,900
prior period adjustment <u> 89,470 </u>
adjusted beginning RE 798,370
net income 1,663,000
cash dividends <u> (77,800) </u>
ending RE 2,383,570
Explanation:
The amend of the mistake is done to adjust the beginning retained earnings as it didn't occur in the current accounting cycle.
We have to added as it was posted as an expense something it wasnt Thus, our expense were overstated making a lower net income
then, we proceed normally by adding the net income and decreasing the cash dividends paid to arrive to ending RE
Answer:
(g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Increase in price of typical soda = 10 cents
Total consumed = 150,000 sodas [er day
Dropped quantity = 75,000 sodas
So by considering the above information, the per day compensating variation of the tax varies from 0 and - 7,500
Since the sugar sweetened sodas is treated as a normal goods. Moreover, people can substitute the other goods also if there is an increase in a price of the good
The -7,500 is come from = (-75,000 × 0.10)
The options are as follows
(a) Greater than -$15k because soda is a luxury good with income (b) -$15k because that is the old consumption level times the value of the tax (c) Between -S7.5k and -$15k because soda is a luxury good elasticity > 1 with income elasticity >1 (d) Between -$7.5k arti -$15k because residents can substitute to other products (e) -$7.5k because that is the new consumption level times the value of the tax ()-$7.5k because that is the change in consumption times the value of the tax (g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products (h) Between 0 and -$7.5k because because beverages are typically necessity goods with 6) Nothing because there was no effect on income G) It is impossible to say without knowing consumers' marginal rate of substitution income elasticity less than 1