Answer:
maybe the person is paralyzed from the neck down and cant use their hands to drink. Brainliest pleeease
Explanation:
The point the king is trying to make is, essentially, that while what Hitler did was considered legal and while what the Hungarian Freedom Fighters did was illegal, it is all a matter of human rights. While what Hitler did may have been legal, it was not morally correct to kill 6 million people. And while it was illegal to aid the Jews and provide comfort, it is morally correct to help these people in a time of need, as stated by the golden rule of every religion, do unto others as you would like to have done to you. It is mostly based on what people believe is correct and if certain people believed what Hitler believed, they would not have that certain moral correctness. So in standing up for what you believe in, a change can be made based on the actions; illegal or not.
Answer:
By noticing how the character interacts with other characters.
By noticing details about what the character says, does, and thinks.
By noticing how the other characters perceive the character.
By noticing the context, and use it to make inferences about the character.
Explanation:
Indirect characterization is the process by which the writer presents the personality of the character through different methods except for directly describing it. That is to say, the character is identified by the way he/she acts, talks and looks like, and this is how the reader determines what kind of person the character is.
