Answer:
Question 1: getting there
Mars- between 150 and 300 days depending on where mars is in relation to the earth, the speed of the launch, and the exact travel path that will be taken
Uranus- about 9 and a half years
Question 2: weather
Mars- the atmosphere is completely thin, and an extremely cold planet, with an average temperature of around -80°
Uranus- has very strange seasons due to its tilt, has a surface temperature of about -300°F, strong winds, and sometimes clouds made up of methane ice crystals
Question 3: clothing
Mars and Uranus- both mars and Uranus are unsuitable for humans, you would most definetly need a full body space suit such as the Z-2 Spacesuit created by NASA
you can answer the rest based off imagination and Google for facts
The statement that best explains the location of the asteroid belt is that Most asteroids can be found between Mars and Jupiter.
<h3>Where is the
location of the asteroid belt?</h3>
The Main Belt can be seen around the location which is found in between Mars and Jupiter, and this can be calculate to be two to four times the Earth-sun distance.
It should be noted that it spans a region about 140 million miles across, hence The statement that best explains the location of the asteroid belt is that Most asteroids can be found between Mars and Jupiter.
Learn more about asteroids at;
brainly.com/question/25887038
#SPJ1
True, A 'planar projection map' is helpful for sea navigation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
A 'planar projection map' that shows the particulars of the globe in a flat surface projection. The pictures projected by the map are shown in rectangular-shaped. If any other map such as Cylindrical map is used then, the edges are not so perfect, they show distortion. With the help of all three coordinates, it shows a 3-D picture of the globe and its objects which can be considered almost as real as the actual object. They are also known as azimuthal projections and are mostly used in projecting polar regions.
Corporations are often accused of despoiling the environment in their quest for profit. Free enterprise is supposedly incompatible with environmental preservation so that government regulation is required.
Such thinking is the basis for current proposals to expand environmental regulation greatly. So many new controls have been proposed and enacted that the late economic journalist Warren Brookes once forecast that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could well become "the most powerful government agency on earth, involved in massive levels of economic, social, scientific, and political spending and interference.
But if the profit motive is the primary cause of pollution, one would not expect to find much pollution in socialist countries, such as the former Soviet Union, China, and in the former Communist countries of Eastern and Central Europe. That is, in theory. In reality, exactly the opposite is true: The socialist world suffers from the worst pollution on earth. Could it be that free enterprise is not so incompatible with environmental protection after all?
Answer:
Neither country wanted to engage in a nuclear war that would lead to worldwide destruction.
Explanation:
The US and USSR became arch enemies soon after World War II ended, and that continued to be the case until the USSR seized to exist. The two countries became opponents and developed very bad and tense relations because they had different ideas as to how the world should shape up, but also because both of them wanted to be the only dominant power in the world.
Both countries were heavily armed and the weaponry was constantly icnreasing, with newer and better weapons constantly been created to gain an advantage. Nuclear weapons were abundant at both as well, but they never got used in an open war between them. The reason was simple, if a direct war between them occurred, there would have been worldwide destruction and everyone will lose, so that was kept as the last option in case of an attack by the other. Not to be mistaken though, these two were constantly in war with each other, not just diplomatic, but also military one, just that they used other countries as battlefields where they supported a particular side.
