Answer: dayna i don’t even know
Explanation:
uh google sucks and i need an answer it’s due in 7 minutes...
Your answer would be D for Diversified.
<u><em>HOPE THIS HELPED!!</em></u>
The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
Answer: I think the answer is "It weakened attempts to abolish slavery."
Answer: The Soviet Union had broken the Yalta agreement, and Truman was thoroughly upset with Stalin. ... Truman's approach toward Molotov was justified. He wanted to convey the message to Stalin through Molotov that Stalin should keep his promises of holding a free election in Poland.
Explanation:
