Answer:
The allowance can be taken based on:
a reduction (production) of the oil and gas reserves.
Explanation:
A limited partnership's allowance for depletion is a special form of depreciation used to account for the gradual reduction in the value of natural resources based on their usage or consumption. There are two methods for recognizing depletion of natural resources. They are the cost depletion method, which is based on usage, and the percentage depletion method, which is a percentage of gross earnings. Then, depletion is different from depreciation, in that depreciation is for tangible assets, while depletion is for natural assets.
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
In each other presentation, choosing the “Reuse Slides” tool and then browsing to find the credits slide in the original presentation.
Brainliest please!!!!!!!!!
A. $625.71
619+619×0.13/12
Answer: change the forecast category to omitted on the duplicate opportunities
Explanation:
The sales process should be modified to ensure opportunities are not double-counted in the pipeline by changing the forecast category to omitted on the duplicate opportunities.
When this is done, the multiple opportunities for the same end customer will be curtailed and hence, there'll be accuracy with regards to the pipeline report.
Answer:
No, there is no contract between the two parties because of withdrawal of offer (Revocation) before the acceptance of the other party.
Explanation:
When one party offers another party and after some time the offer maker withdraws the offer by communicating that they had revoked then the offer is no more available to the other party and is often termed as Revocation. So when the offer maker revokes before the acceptance of the offer by the other party then their is no offer at consideration to the other party, which means if there is no offer then their can not be an acceptance of an offer and of course when there is no acceptance then there is no contract.
The communication of revocation was held before the acceptance of the offer of the other party which agains says that the contract was not actually formed.
