Answer: The answer is:
B in arguments about federal interference with southern states practing slavery.
Explanation: This a part of his ideas.
<em> "Our safety and prosperity depend on maintaining, in their full vigor, the restrictions imposed on the powers granted by the Constitution. So long as these are so maintained, and the powers confined to the objects intended by that sacred compact, we will be safe and prosperous,"</em>
For him, states’ rights theory was not a vindication of local democracy, but a safeguard for the distinct interests of the Southern slaveholding minority.
I think On December 25, 1991, he resigned. By January of 1992, by popular demand, theSoviet Union<span> ceased to exist. In its place, a new entity was formed. It was called the “Commonwealth of Independent Republics,” and was composed of most of the independent countries of the former </span><span>Soviet Union.
</span>
The answer is: c. They show that the Court has expanded the groups that can expect equal protection of the law
In the past, the protection of the law only specifically mentioned for Male citizens who belong in racial majority.
Over the centuries, the court keep expanded the groups that can achieve protection by the laws (such as women and minorities) and started granted them with various rights which previously only owned by white male citizens (such as the right to vote)
States were also given a chance to propose changes, or amendments. Three-fourths of the states have to approve the amendment for it to become law. In the past 200 years, the Constitution has been amended 27 times. The 13th Amendment, in 1865, forever banned the practice of slavery.
