Answer:
Rachel Carson presents a convincing argument. She uses facts, examples, and expert opinions to appeal to logos to support her claim that pesticides are extremely destructive and only partially effective. She organizes her argument logically, establishing the dangers of pesticides and, then, examining the misuse of these chemicals. As she approaches the end of the argument, she appeals to pathos by using loaded language and vivid imagery. She clearly outlines her contentions and puts forth the call to action: the public needs to inform themselves in order to make a decision about how to proceed.
Explanation:
Answer:
With more facts
Explanation:
In your paragraph:
Identify the opposing argument.
Respond to it by discussing the reasons the argument is incomplete, weak, unsound, or illogical.
Provide examples or evidence to show why the opposing argument is unsound, or provide explanations of how the opposing argument is incomplete or illogical.
The police throw tear gas; The Hate U Give was one of my favorite books to read. :-)
C. By letting the reader or audience know something that the characters do not
I believe is C sorry if i’m wrong.
