Answer 1 : According to the NASA and the NOAA 2016 was the hottest year on the record worldwide.
Answer 2 : To get a complete picture of Earth’s temperature, scientists combine measurements from the air above land and the ocean surface collected by ships, buoys and sometimes satellites.
The temperature at each land and ocean station is compared daily to what is ‘normal’ for that location and time, typically the long-term average over a 30-year period. The differences are called an ‘anomalies’ and they help scientists evaluate how temperature is changing over time, a ‘positive’ anomaly means the temperature is warmer than the long-term average, a ‘negative’ anomaly means it’s cooler
Here are four datasets to study global temperature.The UK Met Office Hadley Centre and the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit jointly produce HadCRUT4 .
In the US, the GISTEMP series comes via the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Sciences (GISS), while the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) creates the MLOST record. The Japan Meteorological Agency ( JMA) produces a fourth dataset.
Answer 3 : the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York City have found that 2006 was the fifth warmest year in the past century
Answer 4 : We can notice about the trend of the top warmest years that an increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels, continues to drive this long-term warming trend. It is responsible for warming both the atmosphere and the oceans as greenhouse gas concentrations continue to grow. We can notice that it is very hot in the pole,for example we have a faster warming in the Arctic than the rest of the world.
Source: Cowtan & Way (2013).
You just follow the formula and see what it gets you from there.
The formula itself is literally b(1-r)t.
b= 2700
1 - 4% = .96
t = 5 years from 2015
This is a prediction, so it's exact value is irrelevant as long as it is close to your options, which Option C, 2202, is the best option for this.
I didn't follow the formula, however. I just did 10% of 2700, which is 270, and just multiplied it by 2, to get 20% of 2700 (Which is equal to 4% for five years decrease) and just subtracted the difference, leaving me with 2160, which is closer to 2202 rather than 2035. [Using the formula in the calculator kinda confused me, as it didn't turn out so pretty.]
Answer:
It was a dilemma because a multitude of reasons.
Explanation:
First, the original 13 states were given too much independence and therefore were basically their own countries that count print their own money. Then there is the fact that Congress was unable to tax and they also couldn’t regulate commerce; therefore, there wasn’t a stable national economy. There was also no national court system or judicial branch. There was also no executive branch approved by congress and we also have to mention that each state had a vote in the congress.
I believe the correct answer is D, based on my general knowledge.
Hope I helped. ^ω^
Answer:
what are the names of the women
