Which of the following best explains why primary sources are important to historians?

English

2 answers:

Misha Larkins [42]3 years ago

5 0

A.
<span>They provide firsthand accounts of historical events.</span>

12345 [234]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

A). They provide firsthand accounts of historical events.

Explanation:

Primary sources like artifacts or manuscripts, eyewitness or any other document are significant to historians as 'they provide firsthand accounts of historical events' without any adulteration and therefore, offer authentic and credible information. These sources serve as the organic matter which aids in proposing effective research or conclusion. Primary sources have a direct affiliation to the event or occurrence that would assist in offering more authentic and reliable information as compared to a secondary source contain chances of adulteration or manipulation. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.

You might be interested in

You are an etymologist who has recently discovered the history of one of your spelling words. You have been asked to write a des

never [62]

A good friendship is one that can hold even through hardships. We often forget that relationships can be vital to our wellbeing, and we should always hold onto our friends. Always take ownership for your mistakes, and make sure your friends do too. Otherwise, the relationship could end up causing immense stress in your life and turn out to be more of a dictatorship than a friendship.

6 0

3 years ago

27) Which statement BEST expresses the climax of this story?

kobusy [5.1K]

Answer:

if I'm correct the answer is d

4 0

4 years ago

Which topic offers enough depth to allow the development of a research

Oxana [17]

Answer:

You should probably go for D. Write your research on it