Answer:
I personally think the Senate should be elected and that it is to stay that way. Government would be too powerful since the source of it's power is The People. If the people cannot directly vote and just have to watch as they're chosen in front of them, they might have to overthrow the "tyranny".
Explanation:
"Voters have elected their senators in the privacy of the voting booth since 1913. The framers of the Constitution, however, did not intend senators to be elected in this way and included in Article I, section 3, "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote." The election of delegates to the Constitutional Convention established the precedent for state selection. The framers believed that in electing senators, state legislatures would cement their tie with the national government, which would increase the chances for ratifying the Constitution. They also expected that senators elected by state legislatures would be able to concentrate on the business at hand without pressure from the populace," as it says in senate.gov.
This means that Senate is usually elected. They should stay it that way- it's as if changing an amendment, which would be a long and stressful process. Which means it will never happen. The People are the source of the government's power and they should stay as it otherwise the US' gov't may be seen as too powerful.
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
Answer:
Proactive interference
Explanation:
In psychology, the term proactive interference refers to a type of interference that happens when we cannot learn a new task because what we've learned before is interfering with the acquisition of the new knowledge. In other words, our previous knowledge interferes with the new task and makes it more difficult to learn the new one.
In this example, Deanna first studied Spanish in high school, later in college she registered for a remedial French course but when she was asked to speak in french she would respond with Spanish words. We can see that <u>the previous knowledge that Deanna has (Spanish language) is interfering in her process of learning a new language (French)</u> therefore, this would be an example of proactive interference.
Yes! All the major mountain ranges, such as the Himalayas and the Rocky Mountains were all formed by tectonic plates colliding and pushing each other up, creating mountains.⛰
Answer: Sociological imagination
Explanation:According to Wright Mills this process encourages one to think out of the box , think of something different or away from your normal routine in order to have a fresh perspective.He challenges one to look at what is the link between their experience and the society in which they live.
This allows a person to look at their action and how those actions impact the surrounding society .
Instead of putting criminals in prison the new mayor gave them something positive to do in the society , have activities to do which takes away their focus on committing criminal activities.
