Answer:
find out i think
Explanation:
Because i think thats the answer
Answer: The book Hiroshima by John Hersey had expressed the violation of the human rights of many people because of the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Many had died due to nuclear radiation caused by the attack. Many innocent lives were taken because of what the US had done in the pas
Explanation:
Considering Hiroshima is based on the real-world event through World War 2, the human rights issue that is investigated in the novel is investing the casualties brought on by atomic bombing.
OTOH, it was during a time of war, a war began by the other side, and a war that side had irrevocably lost years before, and yet they refused to yield and thus, end the war. So, Japan carries the full accountability for their willful and deranged stubbornness, and their willful refusal to save their own people from a war that they had no hope to evade suffering.
Hope this helps
Answer:
<h3>People captured for slavery, folks were full of misery, looked the same as the other people from Africa are factual.</h3><h3>Shed their wings, forgot about flying, who could fly kept their power are fictional.</h3>
Explanation:
- In "The People Could Fly," by Virginia Hamilton, she presents the story about the suffering and violence of the enslaved people in a folklore genre.
- She presents factual events such as 'people captured for slavery, folks were full of misery, and looked the same as the other people from Africa' to address the suffering and atrocity experienced by the African-Americans during slavery.
- And at the same, the narrator adds fictional details such as 'shed their wings, forgot about flying, and who could fly kept their power' as an element of folklore in the story.
This is a short modernist fiction that celebrates the life of the imagination, and points to its shortcomings. As a narrator, Woolf was in the habit of thinking aloud and talking to herself, as well as to her imaginary readers. Here she takes the process one stage further by ‘talking’ to her own fictional creations.
She also shows the process of the artistic imagination at work, raising doubts about its own creations, asking questions, and posing alternative interpretations. She even develops lines of narrative then backtracks on them as improbable or cancels them as invalid, mistaken interpretation, or rejects them as inadequate.
In other words, the very erratic process of ratiocination – all the uncertainties, mistakes, hesitations – are reproduced as part of her narrative. She even addresses her own subject, silently, from within the fictional frame, and reflects on fictional creations which ‘die’ because they are rejected as unacceptable:
Answer:
trying to go before I start my paragraphs I make sure I have all my evidence in my reasons to why I picked it
Explanation:
