Answer and Explanation:
The preamble begins by including the people in the purposes and objectives that the country wants to achieve with the establishment of the republic. At this point in the text, the authors made a strong appeal to emotion. This is because when they used the expression "We the People" they made the public feel included and united together for a single purpose. This term also reaffirms the responsibility for the equality that was being established in the country.
The commitment to equality is so great that the preamble's authors decided to use a simple diction, with commonly known words, leaving the text direct, objective and logical, allowing absolutely all citizens of the country to understand it, regardless of the level of education that they presented. Despite this, the text presents itself in a very punctual and not at all widespread manner, concisely setting out what it wants to achieve.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Pathos is any type of emotions even if its happy, sad, mad, etc.
please mark me as brainliest and rate ,thank me please i begg you
Explanation:
The Theory of Hormheb
The king’s deputy, also known as Horemheb, may have also been responsible for the death of King Tut as well. The possibility that King Tut was getting older and probably ready to take powers into his own hands may have contributed to his early demise. For many years it was believed that Hormheb guided King Tut in his royal decisions as a child. As King Tut grew older and became more independent he started making his own decisions without the aid of Horemheb. This new thinking might have upset him and he quickly saw his power fading away. This independence that King Tut was attaining might have upset him and could been the reason as to why he killed King Tut.
Though Horemheb did not get the throne after King Tut’s death he did get it after Ay. Upon becoming the pharaoh he restored Egypt to its traditional tradition which was the worshiping of the many ancient gods. He moved his capital to Memphis and returned all the temples to their rightful priests. During his reign as pharaoh he removed any signs of Akhenaten’s religion.
By his actions, many Egyptologists and historians strongly assume that Horemheb wanted to restore Egypt to its traditional ways. Although, in hindsight, it appears that King Tut was also leaning in the direction of restoring Egypt to the more habitual ways before his death—it might not have been fast enough for Horemheb though.
Mohamed El-Saghir, head of Upper Egyptian Antiquities, believes that Horemheb could not have committed the murder of the pharaoh. Mohamed believes that because King Tut was restoring Egypt to its traditional ways, Horemheb would not have had any reason to kill him. He does find it interesting that Horemheb removed King Tut’s name from several items and replaced it with his. Even so, it’s still not enough evidence and most pharaohs always tried to outdo the pharaohs before them.
Answer:
The cost for food would go up (people are eating more)
People would be smarter
Everyone would be good at their hoby if they had one
Explanation:
In my extra time I would live my life and party and just have fun.
Answer: that parents would rather sell their children than be responsible for them.
Explanation:
A False Premise refers to a situation where an argument is based on a wrong assumption. Normally this would mean that the argument would be wrong as well but sometimes this is not the case.
In this essay, the author, Jonathan Swift relied on the false premise that parents would rather sell their children than be responsible for them. In other words he was saying that parents would sell their children to the higher classes to to survive.
